Global Crisis/Innovation Blog
How to Kill a 168-year-old Business Without Trying: Murdoch, Sleaze and the Zimbardo Prison Experiment
By Shlomo Maital
News of the World: Last Issue. No Thank You!
What in the world is the connection between a 40-year-old psychology experiment, that continues to haunt the experimenter, distinguished psychologist Phillip Zimbardo, and Sunday’s closing of the sleazy yellow tabloid News of the World, after 168 years of continuous operation?
Let’s start with London’s News of the World, owned by media tycoon Rupert Murdoch, who owns News Corp. Journalists tapped into the phone of a murdered teenager and erased messages, to keep the story alive and sell newspapers. Writing about the mess, New York Times columnist Joe Nocera comments, “Reporters who work at pressure-packed scandal sheets quickly become inured to crossing lines and destroying lives; it’s what they do. On the other hand, it’s still hard to believe that not a single reporter or editor at The News of the World had the sense to realize that tapping into the cellphone of a murdered teenager was deeply wrong.”
Now back to Zimbardo.
In his Stanford prison experiment, run from August 14th to 20th 1971 , twenty-four students were selected out of 75 to play the role of prisoners and live in a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford psychology building, while others were told to play ‘officers’ and torture the prisoners. Roles were assigned randomly. The participants adapted to their roles well beyond what even Zimbardo himself expected, leading the “Officers” ultimately to subject some of the prisoners to torture. Many of the prisoners developed passive attitudes and accepted physical abuse, and, at the request of the guards, readily inflicted punishment on other prisoners who attempted to stop it. The entire experiment was abruptly stopped after only six days. The experimental process and the results remain controversial.
Zimbardo was surprised that when told to play a role of prison guard and officer, including torture, many of the subjects agreed. He has found it hard to live down being known as the “prison guy” for the last forty years, and has developed a training program to help young people to defy the ‘everybody does it’ rationale of immoral behavior and instead, act as responsible moral leaders. Rupert Murdoch should enroll.
Why did not a single News of the World reporter blow the whistle, protest, inform the police that a serious crime had been committed? It was the ‘prison’ mentality, ‘this is what we do, this is how we act, this is the norm, if you’re one of us, you better fall in line’. The Zimbardo experiment’s result shows the obedience of people, their readiness to do evil, when provided with a legitimizing ideology and social and institutional support.
Who created this mentality? Tycoon Rupert Murdoch himself. He will escape unscathed. After closing News of the World – not because his conscience troubled him, but because the paper lost its advertisers and hence had no business raison d’etre — he will likely (and soon) launch a new scandal sheet under a different name, probably equally profitable and equally devoid of ethics. Those who buy and read it are as morally blemished as he is.



1 comment
Comments feed for this article
July 17, 2011 at 8:40 pm
dave
Although its an english newspaper, consider this experiment as being applied right here in the USA….today. In other words what you see is a reflection of general enslavement mentality. You have a once proud and fiercely independent people–in fact so independent that they were declared independent of government in their first LAW called the Declaration of Independence. And yet tied directly to Zimbardo’s experiment, who are the present-day “……prisoners [who] developed passive attitudes and accepted physical abuse, and, at the request of the guards, readily inflicted punishment on other prisoners who attempted to stop it.”? Think about it…cops/guards/courts/government out of control operating on a double standard. Consider the case of the woman groping TSA subject to a felony…yet the TSA eludes the same standard. So who are the “prisoners”? I count those to be the taxpayers don’t you? The people who accept the “service” of government….which is really no service at all. Are you not is essence offered “NO CHOICE” but isn’t it offered as CHOICE? When you fill out a government form, does it offer you CHOICE or does it offer LIMITATION disguised as choice? Who signs forms under penalty of perjury…..your servants?….or you?…so who REALLY is the subject servant? And when you object, isn’t it the OTHER citizens who tell you “just live with it and be happy”? Yet don’t these same people object at being treated in a crappy manner at say KMart? Why? Because they know something better exists…don’t they? What is being kept from them are all the concepts of freedom….and further what is in “The Organic Laws of the USA”. Google it and rediscover that there ARE indeed alternatives to the slavery offered as “freedom”.